April 28, 2026
There are a lot of reactions in the indie author community about Draft 2 Digital’s recent changes to how their platform works and how they charge for it. To summarize their recent changes, they introduced a $20 new account fee and a $12 annual fee that only applies if you earn less than $100 a year in book sales.
The indie author community is disappointed to see these changes especially since this is not the only platform to make changes of late.
While many of the immediate reactions to this change are to vilify Draft2Digital, we think it is important to understand why they made this change as it does reflect something very interesting about the industry.
The real problem for authors is not the fee, it's that your work will not stand out from the noise of quick generated content clogging up the retailers.
Draft2Digital didn’t make this move arbitrarily. The stated reason is “bookspam” - a flood of low-quality, often AI-generated content overwhelming distribution channels.
This problem is real and this problem is not confined to just Draft2Digital.
Between 2022 and 2025, title volume exploded. Spam farms learned to game the system, creating dozens of accounts, uploading low-effort books, and flooding retailers at scale. For a platform like Draft2Digital that means they have to host and support so much more content that really won’t ever sell and even worse it could push out quality content from being shown on retailers for actual authors.
The fees are a defense against this. You can quickly stop the flood of content by adding even the smallest paywall as it makes the scheme unprofitable. The downside of course is that a decent sized segment of the indie community has to suffer and pay more for a service they used to get for free.
The impact of the fee does have an upside for the community.
As mentioned, as the flood of extremely low quality AI generated content hits retailers, there is less visibility for your books. D2D’s fee helps keep that content off retailers so your work can have more real estate and more of a chance of being discovered. This is a good thing for indie authors.
A Quick Note About AI
I also want to be clear that this article is not insinuating that AI content is bad or should be blocked or removed from retailers. There are several authors who are prompting and using AI extremely well and creating very high quality books as a result.
This is not what D2D is fighting and this is not what we are referring to as the flood of low quality content. D2D is fighting the junk content that is not being human reviewed or cleverly prompted. They are fighting the content that is meant to trick readers into a one time transaction which has negative repercussions on the whole community.
We all want readers to be able to shop with confidence and try out new authors and new work without fear of being tricked into buying low quality, quickly spun up work.
As an indie author, there is something very valuable to understand here. The landscape has changed dramatically yet again. In the last 10 or so years there has been a large push toward rapid release. Where you are encouraged to publish more books per year, which helps feed the Amazon or KU algorithm and keeps readers in your ecosystems. While this was one of several good strategies for that time, AI is affecting this strategy.
Namely, every author can rapid release now, and even worse, every person can rapid release now.
Of course there are major differences in quality but it doesn’t change the facts. Rapid release loses its effectiveness when there are thousands and thousands of new books hitting KU and the KU algorithm can’t even determine what book to show to its reader base. The repercussions are obvious. Your work has an even smaller chance of being picked up by the algorithms than ever before.
Instead we think authors should begin to rethink their strategies and opt more for control.
With the changing landscape direct sales are more important than ever.
Direct sales give authors control over their content and data on their readers. Reader lists have always been touted as the holy grail of information for an author, and now that rings true more than ever. If you have control and access to your readership, you can reach them through the content flood.
You have a direct path to your readership which can get your book to its intended destination without being at the mercy of an algorithm. At Curios we have built that into every part of our platform.
Curios has built the easiest way for you to sell directly to your audience and for you to capture your audience’s contact information.
Additionally Curios is a 100% platform, where authors get 100% of your sale. This differs dramatically from the retail locations that D2D distributes on. D2D takes 10% of the retail price and the retailer takes about 30% of the retail price which leaves you with 60% of your ebook sales.
Receiving 100% of your sale offers you the ability to keep your career afloat on less sales volume overall.
Direct sales also quickly weeds out quality over slop. Low quality content can't hide behind algorithmic discovery systems. Direct sales are built on trust, reputation, and foster audience loyalty. Your readers buy from you and you have a chance to build a strong relationship with the reader. This can turn them into advocates which can build a word of mouth funnel for your work that the low quality books could never have.
In the age of unlimited content, authors who are serious about their careers should take a serious look at direct sales.
If you read between the lines, the Draft2Digital fee is not the problem. The problem is the flood of content which only will get worse as AI improves its content generation.
Put simply:
More content.
More competition.
More platform control.
More pressure on creators to perform inside systems they don’t own.
You can continue to play that game or you can opt out for a solution where you have control.
The future doesn’t belong to the platforms that distribute content, it belongs to the creators who own it.
No credit card required. Join creators building real businesses on their own terms.